Having remained silent throughout his months-long trial, the judge in
the Oscar Pistorius murder case reached a verdict to decide the Olympic
athlete's fate Thursday:
Pistorius cannot be found guilty of intentionally killing Reeva
Steenkamp, the judge ruled. As such, under South African law, Pistorius
will not be found guilty of "murder."
The proceedings continue, and Pistorius faces other possible verdicts,
including culpable homicide, that could still land him behind bars. But
not for murder.
The verdict came from Judge Thokozile Masipa alone, as South Africa
does not have jury trials. The 66-year-old said she did not come to her
decision lightly.
Pistorius gunned down girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp on Valentine's Day
2013, in what defense lawyers say was a terrible mistake, believing she
was an intruder.
State prosecutors argued it was premeditated murder, but a lesser
murder charge or negligent killing, both of which call for years in
jail, were also on the table.
Experts pointed to Masipa's record of tough action against criminals
who victimized women as indicators that she would not be easily swayed
by Pistorius' dubious story.
Others describe her as a good listener and a dispassionate analyst of
facts, however, so there was truly no telling how she would rule until
she did so.
Judge Masipa said Pistorius could not have foreseen that the person he
was shooting at, behind the bathroom door, would die, and thus an intent
to kill was not proven.
She also said evidence suggests that Pistorius genuinely believed Reeva Steenkamp was still in the bedroom, and that the person in the bathroom was an intruder.
Before she rejected the premeditated murder charge, Masipa questioned
why he fired "not one ... but four shots" into the bathroom before he
went to find her.
However, she said, his intention to shoot does not necessarily mean the
intent to kill, which was enough to clear the athlete of the worst
criminal charge.
Shorly before, Masipa cast doubt on some of the witness testimony heard
in the six-month trial, and said she believes media coverage
contaminated testimonies.
She described the victim's wound as "immediately incapacitating," and
said she believed a scream heard by witnesses the night of the killing
was from Oscar, not Reeva.
The judge appeared to accept the defense timeline that the shots were
fired first, then the screaming that must have been Pistorius, horrified
at his alleged mistake.